Showing posts with label America. Show all posts
Showing posts with label America. Show all posts

Saturday, 23 August 2025

Review by Nicole Yurcaba of "Wolf Bells" by Leni Zumas



Leni Zumas’s novel Wolf Bells publishes in September 2025 in the United States, and, honestly, with the current socio-political dysfunction rampaging across the US, it is a novel that could arrive at a more appropriate time. Why? With the signing of Trump’s "Big, Beautiful Bill" into law on 4 July 2025, caretakers across the United States will face increased work requirements for Medicaid and SNAP benefits. The bill also reduces accessibility to essential supports and significantly cuts home-and-community-based services. Thus, an important question arises: when the government cuts essential, life-affirming, and life-saving services and benefits to citizens, whose role is it to provide them? Essentially, Wolf Bells—with its portrayal of an intergenerational community led by a former punk singer—attempts to answer this question. However, the novel also dares to explore the consequences of what happens when a community’s good intentions go completely awry.

On a bluff above a river rises the House, a place where the elderly, the disabled, the abandoned, and the young live alongside one another and complete daily tasks and chores in order to receive free rent. Caz, a former punk singer, is the caretaker for the House’s inhabitants. The House teeters on financial ruin’s edge, and to worsen Caz’s predicaments, two kids—Nola and her little cousin James—show up, needing refuge. James is a special-needs child whose behaviour taxes everyone, but a mystery also looms as to why Nola chose to take James and venture towards the House. As each of the characters wrestles with their own strange, often heartbreaking circumstances—ranging from an elderly man whose daughter has seemingly abandoned him to a woman whose memories of the Holocaust haunt her daily—they must also band together to care for James in whatever ways they can. Meanwhile, the authorities are searching for Nola and James, and those in the House’s surrounding area who know Nola and James’s whereabouts threaten to wreck the House’s goals and innerworkings.

Wolf Bells is raw and gritty and real—a bit like a new, contemporary version of Lord of the Flies. Or, perhaps, it can also be compared to that single scene in Tim Burton’s Dark Shadows in which each of the Collins family members are seated miserably around a gigantic table, throwing coarse verbal jabs at one another while Donovan’s "Season of the Witch" plays in the background. The House and its residents are isolated from the outer world’s laws, trappings, and expectations. The House and its residents abide by one set of rules, and, despite their seemingly disrespectful take on another, they do interact and secretly care about one another. Discreetly, Wolf Bells addresses the individual sacrifices, as well as the necessary theoretical, practical and serious changes in societal and cultural mindsets intergenerational living requires. As the housing crisis intensifies, and as medical and long-term care costs skyrocket not only in America, but globally, more and more families and individuals consciously choose intergenerational living. Wolf Bells addresses this issue, since each and every character must make individual sacrifices for the betterment of the House’s residents. Communal bathrooms and living spaces strip away the guise of private ownership and entitlement. Each resident recognizes that spaces like one known as The Fish Bowl are meant for communal interaction, and such spaces eradicate the notion of private ownership. Thus, each character develops a deeper sense of responsibility for maintaining and cleaning these shared spaces. 

Of course, one cannot read Wolf Bells without recognizing the disruption Nola and James’s presence causes for the House’s occupants. Wolf Bells portrays Nola as a sensible, precocious youngster who is wise beyond her years because of the neglect she has endured and navigated. She feels a responsibility to and duty for James and knows and perceives his needs better than most adults. However, no matter how much the House’s adults attempt to band together to care for—and even simply tolerate—the children’s presence, lapses in care develop. At first, it is humorous that James toddles around, eating the leaves of one of the plants in the House. Closer to the novel’s end, one of the characters recognizes that James should not be eating the leaves and that Caz does not even know whether or not the plants are edible or poisonous. In this scene, it becomes evident that the House is not truly intergenerational, since the needs of a toddler have never been considered. Also, James’s special needs pose an even larger challenge for the residents of the House, drawing even more into question the House’s inclusivity. James’s needs should be woven into the daily life of the House’s residents, since his needs are a clear reminder of the residents’ interdependence one another.

For one character, the mysterious Marika, James's personality and his behaviour remind Marika of her brother, Theo, whom German soldiers killed because he was disabled. Of all of Wolf Bells’ characters, Marika displays the most empathy for and connection with James. Nevertheless, Marika possesses an otherness entirely her own, one that also sets her apart from the other characters in Wolf Bells. She is Greek, and she is Jewish, and at one point she reflects: "'And then when I came to this country, I learned that Greek in America, meant 'alien' and 'unintelligible.' To be Greek and Jewish was much worse. Refugees of the war America won were not welcome in America because we were spies and Communists, we would steal jobs from citizens, we would spread contagion.'" Therefore, while James becomes the novel’s great educator, so to speak, he and Marika serve as strange, intergenerational mirrors of one another bound together by their otherness and united by a place that fails to understand them.

 Part of Wolf Bells’ allure lies in that it is implicitly political and socially aware without being polemical and trite. Wolf Bells is as radical as the society-shifting housing practices it explores—one completely unflinching in its boldness and bravery.


About the reviewer
Nicole Yurcaba (Нікола Юрцаба) is a Ukrainian American of Hutsul/Lemko origin. Her poems and reviews have appeared in Appalachian Heritage, Atlanta Review, Seneca Review, New Eastern Europe, Euromaidan Press, Chytomo, and The New Voice of Ukraine. Her poetry collection, The Pale Goth, is available from Alien Buddha Press. 

Friday, 14 June 2019

Review by Charis Buckingham of "Remembered" by Yvonne Battle-Felton


Remembered, Yvonne Battle-Felton’s debut novel, tells the compelling tale of Spring, a former slave, who is forced to confront her past as her son lies dying in a Philadelphia hospital. Set against the backdrop of overt discrimination and racial tensions of early-twentieth-century America, it gives voice to the “whole heap of stories [that] don’t get told." 

Longlisted for the Women’s Prize for Fiction, it’s not hard to see why. Spring’s voice reaches from the page and draws you into a tale of shocking brutality and realities of slavery that Battle-Felton doesn’t shy away from. One of the most striking things about this novel is its unflinching depiction of the depravities endemic within this period. It’s never unnecessarily graphic, but it makes for a difficult read in places – when discussing rape and the deliberate death of infants – and this is what makes it such a gripping narrative. A subject of this nature should not be easy or light-hearted, and the questions it poses about heritage, unspoken voices and motherhood are intensely thought-provoking. 

As a lover of historical fiction, I anticipated enjoying Remembered for that aspect alone. Meticulously researched, it did not disappoint. Yet more than that, it is a poignant sketch of human character and its resilience in the face of immense hardship, that is both fascinating and pertinent. Truth is at the heart of this novel and for that reason, it’s a must-read.


About the reviewer
Charis Buckingham predominately writes Young Adult and historical fiction, and loves to sing and read. She lives in Leicester, having recently graduated from the University of Leicester with an MA in Creative Writing.

Wednesday, 5 September 2018

Interview with Dustin Illingworth



Dustin Illingworth’s writing has appeared in a variety of outlets including The Atlantic, Paris Review, the Times Literary Supplement, Los Angeles Times, and the Los Angeles Review of Books. He is the managing editor of The Scofield, and a contributing editor at Literary Hub. Dustin lives in Newport Beach, California and is currently finishing a debut novel. 

You can also read a list of Dustin Illingworth's Top Reads of 2016 here





Interviewed by Lee Wright

LW: What motivates your writing? 

DI: It is something I try not to look at too closely. If the motivations behind one’s obsessions become fully intelligible, their power is somehow weakened. If pressed, I would say I write fiction to rescue time. Even if what I reclaim isn’t completely satisfying, the effort represents a stand against the loss we are always in the midst of.  

LW: You are in the process of finishing a debut novel. Have you kept to a strict writing schedule? 

DI: I believe a writer is someone who finds a way to write every day. Ideas are cheap and plentiful, and inspiration pales in comparison to work ethic. My own schedule is very well-defined due to my having a day job. I write every evening after work from six to ten, and much longer on weekends.

LW: In a piece about the Journals of John Cheever, you wrote that Cheever was “a natural miniaturist, a collector of set pieces.” How effective is this style of writing? 

DI: I think writers possess natural capacities, and the best writing arises from an artist discovering the ideal formal vehicle for their vision. Cheever’s digressive richness makes for some of the greatest short fiction ever written, whereas I always feel like his novels are threatening to dissolve into fragmented incident. He can’t help but meander.

LW: What makes for a good piece of creative non-fiction? 

DI: As someone who loathes the personal essay, my favourite non-fiction situates art as existing in conversation with other art rather than (strictly) with oneself. Elizabeth Hardwick is my ideal essayist, a writer whose work moves beyond mere analysis into a kind of luxurious intuition. It is beautiful, often ambiguous, and possessed of a tensile strength.

LW: Is fiction harder to write?      

DI: Infinitely so. An essay or review is a discrete, self-contained piece of writing—if you’ve written enough of them, you begin to have a feeling for pacing, transition, where to include the offhand flourish or coup de grace, etc. A novel, though, is a torment unlike anything I’ve ever experienced. Fiction rubs your nose in your own ineptitude day after day. Again, it is as much an act of endurance as a work of inspiration.

LW: How did you develop your writing in the early days? 

DI: I read (and continue to read) writers who are vastly superior to me. Writing daily and reading those who have achieved an authoritative style are the only ways I know how to improve as a writer. Reading Shirley Hazzard or Mavis Gallant or John Hawkes or Malcolm Lowry impresses upon me how poor of a writer I am, and how far I need to go.

LW: What has been the most valuable piece of advice you’ve received as a writer?  

DI: “Write as if this were your only book, your last book. Into it put everything you were saving—everything precious, every scrap of capital, every penny as it were. Don’t be afraid of being left with nothing.” André Gide wrote this, and James Salter memorably condensed it: “Save nothing.”


About the interviewer
Lee Wright was born in Nuneaton, Warwickshire in 1980 and has been writing both fiction and non-fiction since 2008. He is taking an MA in Creative Writing at the University of Leicester in 2017.